Posted 09 April 2006 - 12:57 AM
For me it is either IE or Firefox.
both have their advantages,
for general browsing i tend to use IE cos u click it and boom its there. and for developing stuff i tend to use FF. got some cool plug-ins for it now

PK
Posted 09 April 2006 - 01:05 AM
Posted 09 April 2006 - 02:53 AM
opera...only cause my physics teacher recommended it...i used to use IE, but now it looks tacky :S
Posted 09 April 2006 - 08:49 AM
Posted 09 April 2006 - 11:33 AM
Firefox. Although my favourites (which now contains almost 200 webpages) is still stored in internet explorer. I haven't yet had the courage to sort through them and transfer them to firefox.
Posted 09 April 2006 - 12:32 PM
QUOTE(Joel @ Apr 9 2006, 12:33 PM)

Firefox. Although my favourites (which now contains almost 200 webpages) is still stored in internet explorer. I haven't yet had the courage to sort through them and transfer them to firefox.

File -> Import?
Posted 09 April 2006 - 12:34 PM
Firefox all the way for me!
Posted 09 April 2006 - 12:55 PM
joel you got the chance to copy all your favorites when you installed firefox..
p.s has anyone here got the fasterfox plugin ?
Posted 09 April 2006 - 01:39 PM
think i'l go for IE, i think i am the only IE fan there is.

i use both FF and IE but yeah all my favs and stuff are on IE and i tend to use it as my default browser. nice that it saves ur temp files aswell, unlike FF. they can come in handy. the new IE looks promising if it is not already out.
Posted 09 April 2006 - 01:46 PM
oh no no no how
my IE crashes all the time its unreliable...it slows my comp down no end. FF is soo nice though *strokes ff*
Posted 09 April 2006 - 01:47 PM
I'm an IE fan too! It does annoy me sometimes, especially when what works in FF doesn't in IE and things like that
Posted 09 April 2006 - 03:32 PM
QUOTE(pseudotoxic @ Apr 9 2006, 01:32 PM)

QUOTE(Joel @ Apr 9 2006, 12:33 PM)

Firefox. Although my favourites (which now contains almost 200 webpages) is still stored in internet explorer. I haven't yet had the courage to sort through them and transfer them to firefox.

File -> Import?
Ah! Thanks. Still got to sort them though...
Posted 09 April 2006 - 03:38 PM
QUOTE(nathanm @ Apr 9 2006, 03:53 AM)

opera...only cause my physics teacher recommended it...i used to use IE, but now it looks tacky :S

Opera is easily the best

way better than Firefox and IE combined

(on windoze anyway)
on Mac I would go for Safari
Posted 09 April 2006 - 03:41 PM
For me its IE - basically because i've never used any other.
Whats the differense between them?
Posted 09 April 2006 - 03:43 PM
QUOTE(oddbins @ Apr 9 2006, 04:41 PM)

For me its IE - basically because i've never used any other.
Whats the differense between them?
IE is awful! No tabs, crap security, no features....etc
Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:29 PM
QUOTE(YIC @ Apr 9 2006, 04:43 PM)

QUOTE(oddbins @ Apr 9 2006, 04:41 PM)

For me its IE - basically because i've never used any other.
Whats the differense between them?
IE is awful! No tabs, crap security, no features....etc
Try fgirefox and you wil NEVER go back to IE!
Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:57 PM
Firefox all the way. If anyone should disagree then you should go ask scott to show you some standards complient sites that are ruined in IE
As for opera there engine isnt that great. Ok its faster and such like but certain site like bank systems will not work in it which is somewhat annoying
Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:32 PM
IE for me. simply because its just there - every computer i've used (home & uni, & school when i was at school) has it
Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:40 PM
QUOTE(Dave @ Apr 9 2006, 06:57 PM)

Firefox all the way. If anyone should disagree then you should go ask scott to show you some standards complient sites that are ruined in IE
It does ma heid in!
Very few browsers pass the Acid 2 Test but the IE developers just thought - Hey, let's make a bastardisation of the web standards so the people can have their coloured scrollbars
Web Designers are usually left crying because they have to code in workarounds for Internet Explorer. There's nothing worse than making a fully standards compliant web-site before realising you have to make about 300 lines of CSS workarounds so that IE can show your page.
Posted 09 April 2006 - 07:24 PM
QUOTE(Scott @ Apr 9 2006, 07:40 PM)

QUOTE(Dave @ Apr 9 2006, 06:57 PM)

Firefox all the way. If anyone should disagree then you should go ask scott to show you some standards complient sites that are ruined in IE
It does ma heid in!
Very few browsers pass the Acid 2 Test but the IE developers just thought - Hey, let's make a bastardisation of the web standards so the people can have their coloured scrollbars
Web Designers are usually left crying because they have to code in workarounds for Internet Explorer. There's nothing worse than making a fully standards compliant web-site before realising you have to make about 300 lines of CSS workarounds so that IE can show your page.
Now Im totally lost - u guys know way to much about computers.