A Protest against the SQA Discussion of a protest.
Discogirl17
Posted 29 May 2004 - 07:08 PM
I told you I'd type the one to the SQA ok, I'll start it on saturday. As fow watchdog and short change, who mentioned them?
little_minx
Posted 29 May 2004 - 07:46 PM
QUOTE(Discogirl17 @ May 29 2004, 08:08 PM)
I told you I'd type the one to the SQA ok, I'll start it on saturday. As fow watchdog and short change, who mentioned them?
I think they were mentioned in other threads
Discogirl17
Posted 29 May 2004 - 07:59 PM
Yeh yeh. I've seen that now. Thanx. Ok I'll do one to watchdog but not to shortchange, thats more about price really but I really dont think wrtiting to watchdog is a good idea. I'm not using my address for it but I will create the letter.
little_minx
Posted 29 May 2004 - 08:06 PM
I think Watchdog woul dneed to have a good few complaints or some large scale scandal before they investigated the SQA. Sob.
Laura xxx
Laura xxx
Discogirl17
Posted 29 May 2004 - 08:17 PM
I know that. Thats why I do not, that's categorically do not want any letters of this type to be produced. Ok I'm only writing the one to the SQA. Martin, you do the watchdog or whatever one.
werlop
Posted 01 June 2004 - 07:40 AM
Do you know how much the SQA charge for exams? you might be surprised:
1 Standard Grade £27.25
1 National Course £32.75
1 National Course Unit by Unit entry £40.25
1 National Unit £6.50
1 National Course — External Assessment only £27.25
1 National Cluster £19.50
1 Late entry charge £27.25
1 Standard Grade £27.25
1 National Course £32.75
1 National Course Unit by Unit entry £40.25
1 National Unit £6.50
1 National Course — External Assessment only £27.25
1 National Cluster £19.50
1 Late entry charge £27.25
Dave
Posted 01 June 2004 - 07:06 PM
as it stands the SQA have to fund themselves and seriously you can't expect such a small amount of money to pay for production, marking and accreditation of exams not to mention paying for perminent staff. If i am not mistaken Martin do you not go to a private school so you more than anyone should know the price of education
Discogirl17
Posted 02 June 2004 - 11:37 PM
The SQA is inefficient in the business sense, its practices are strange. It makes exams papers well in advance yet cannot uses its human resources ie its staff to its advantage in checking for errors. It messes up results and alsorts. It needs to sort itself out.
Dave
Posted 04 June 2004 - 10:51 PM
some say sarcasm is the lowest form of wit i disagree when done properly its a great tool for putting people down and in a way which makes them wonder why they wrote/said the original statement in the first place
On this board there is some very intellignet people with the art of sarcasm to a very high standard
On this board there is some very intellignet people with the art of sarcasm to a very high standard

james1
Posted 05 June 2004 - 03:37 PM
QUOTE (Dave @ Jun 4 2004, 10:51 PM) |
some say sarcasm is the lowest form of wit i disagree when done properly its a great tool for putting people down and in a way which makes them wonder why they wrote/said the original statement in the first place On this board there is some very intellignet people with the art of sarcasm to a very high standard ![]() |
thanks
i was being genuine but martin deleted my posts again
as i said the other day best wishes in what u decide to do