Moral Fabric's Content
There have been 187 items by Moral Fabric (Search limited from 09-August 21)
#21814 What Are YOU Listening To?
Posted by
on 09 May 2005 - 07:38 PM
in
General Chat
The Red Hot Chili Peppers, can't beat Hyde Park,... Can't Stop Hyde Park
#26434 Mood
Posted by
on 22 May 2005 - 03:36 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(Discogirl17 @ May 20 2005, 08:57 PM)
I'm relieved about the Maths exam but at the same time worried
ditto
#24630 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 07:08 PM
in
Homework and Revision Help
revenge will be mine! *Muahahaha... cough...splutter* 
#24629 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 07:07 PM
in
Homework and Revision Help
QUOTE(ermdeviation @ May 14 2005, 10:27 AM)
It also depends on the difficulty of the prelim you sat (or whatever appeal material), the sections you performed badly in must have been done well in the appeal eg. for accounts, I got 93% in my section 2 prelim, so if I screwed section 2 up in the exam, that would be a stronger appeal.
not that your boasting or anything....
#24855 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 19 May 2005 - 12:05 PM
in
Homework and Revision Help
QUOTE(ermdeviation @ May 19 2005, 11:12 AM)
QUOTE(Moral Fabric @ May 18 2005, 07:07 PM)
not that your boasting or anything....
Not at all...simply...sharing my beneficial experiences with others
if that's what they're calling it these days
#22162 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 11 May 2005 - 05:27 PM
in
Homework and Revision Help
cheat =P lol
#34282 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 07 June 2005 - 03:41 PM
in
Homework and Revision Help
Its the first paper i have ever seent hat has had a case study on an industry rather than a business, I thought it was fairly easy though, business management has been one of my stronger areas though.
for the Essay questions i done 3 and 5, but i dont know if i have done well or not because i had pleanty of spare time so i may have not answered fully, especially when you compare it to ermdeviation, i wrote about 15-20 pages, he wrote 29.
Later
Andi
for the Essay questions i done 3 and 5, but i dont know if i have done well or not because i had pleanty of spare time so i may have not answered fully, especially when you compare it to ermdeviation, i wrote about 15-20 pages, he wrote 29.
Later
Andi
#33211 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 03 June 2005 - 08:51 AM
in
Homework and Revision Help
QUOTE(Floorball Maniac @ Jun 3 2005, 09:27 AM)
I am not doing BM but I would like to wish everyone who is the best of luck!
I will think about you while I am relaxing at home with no more exams. Actually I wont because I am working in two hours.
Good luck!
I will think about you while I am relaxing at home with no more exams. Actually I wont because I am working in two hours.
Good luck!
cheers
#22157 HBM Archive 2004-2005
Posted by
on 11 May 2005 - 04:58 PM
in
Homework and Revision Help
sorry bud, i have to disagree, if you put:
-Rights Issue - when shares are issued,
yes you should be deducted because you have not expressed an true understanding, maybe a 1/2 mark
how ever if i said
-Rights Issue - this is when current ordinary share holders are given the opportunity to buy more shares by a ratio, e.g. 1:2 this is when a share holder with 100 shares can buy another 200 from the company, relative. This can raise finance quickly for a company.
whats wrong with that?
-Rights Issue - when shares are issued,
yes you should be deducted because you have not expressed an true understanding, maybe a 1/2 mark
how ever if i said
-Rights Issue - this is when current ordinary share holders are given the opportunity to buy more shares by a ratio, e.g. 1:2 this is when a share holder with 100 shares can buy another 200 from the company, relative. This can raise finance quickly for a company.
whats wrong with that?
#24611 A little game!
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 06:54 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(Discogirl17 @ May 18 2005, 07:52 PM)
Someone else guessed it two pages back. Give us another one to guess please
rage
ok
um
C by PP
#24592 A little game!
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 06:43 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(Discogirl17 @ May 18 2005, 07:30 PM)
Thats right. Now give us one to guess
mine wasnt done !!!!
C by JF
#27083 A little game!
Posted by
on 24 May 2005 - 01:54 PM
in
General Chat
not a big 'stones fan,...ummmmm
#27879 A little game!
Posted by
on 25 May 2005 - 02:20 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(D_n_y @ May 24 2005, 04:59 PM)
Another random one from the radio-
SA - H
title clue "the belief that pleasure is the principle good, and should be the highest aim of the individual and society."
SA - H
title clue "the belief that pleasure is the principle good, and should be the highest aim of the individual and society."
better clue
#24607 A little game!
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 06:50 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(Discogirl17 @ May 18 2005, 07:47 PM)
Carvel by John Fruscante or something
Personally I dont know the song but thats what someone already said ok so yours was guessed.
Personally I dont know the song but thats what someone already said ok so yours was guessed.
not carvel but John Frusciante was right, it was Curtains, i love carvel, apart from that crappy josh's synthesizer bit, i hate that, ruined the album for me, but that guy is the best.
so how did you know that one???
#23302 A little game!
Posted by
on 14 May 2005 - 10:52 PM
in
General Chat
Try this
C by JF
C by JF
#26410 A little game!
Posted by
on 22 May 2005 - 02:42 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(D_n_y @ May 21 2005, 10:28 PM)
G S by TRS
clue?
#25421 MATHS EXAM 2005
Posted by
on 20 May 2005 - 12:19 PM
in
Mathematics
QUOTE(pseudotoxic @ May 20 2005, 01:17 PM)
QUOTE(*Suz* @ May 20 2005, 01:10 PM)
In the recurrance relations question in paper one, did everyone work k out to =1?
I said 4 = 4k + 5
and k = -1/4
so did I, i think
#25419 MATHS EXAM 2005
Posted by
on 20 May 2005 - 12:18 PM
in
Mathematics
QUOTE(pseudotoxic @ May 20 2005, 12:23 PM)
Very enjoyable! I'm feeling quite confident.
ditto plus paper one was easier that paper two, i think i got 2 answers wrong, maybe 3 but i'll still get a decent amount of marks i reckon
#23884 Help The Site Grow!
Posted by
on 16 May 2005 - 09:50 PM
in
General Chat
so how is it you become an admin, i would love to help out... you guys have helped me so much, i want to put something back in...
#24614 Crazy Frog
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 06:58 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(ally @ Jan 29 2005, 05:45 PM)
Can't stand it. It's getting on my nerves now. 
lol
It was on MTV earlier and my remote decided not to work at that point, so I had to run out of the room!!
lolIt was on MTV earlier and my remote decided not to work at that point, so I had to run out of the room!!
lmfao!
#24620 Crazy Frog
Posted by
on 18 May 2005 - 07:01 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(Discogirl17 @ May 18 2005, 07:59 PM)
Hey its not that funny- I do that too
I scream and stick my fingers in my ears then run away from the TV
I scream and stick my fingers in my ears then run away from the TV
i just change the channel, or switch off... mentally
#22099 Socialism etc.
Posted by
on 11 May 2005 - 01:13 PM
in
General Chat
I've just joined HSN and I was guided towards this argument by a current member and friend, ermdeviation. I'm a Capitalist on a personal level and but I have to agree with some socialistic views and policies like Benefits and free healthcare, etc.
However it does not work. It is highly unreasonable to think that by turning a world into equally distributed wealth that it will work, there are people in this world that just would not conform, some people strive for more. Majoritably mankind would benefit, but in the long run it would just lead to a huge revolution because of personal wants becoming 'needs'.
Maybe it is just my view, but I cannot see a world working purely on Socialism or Capitalism, a blend will need to be created, a fair one, where it is possible to progress in life and become wealthy without being taxed 90%, but with poverty and crime non existent and human rights adhered to.
It i this Utopian situation that, both sides of the coin, whether Socialist or Capitalist, strive for, but arrogance causes them to rarely see the advantage of the 'opposing' side. A blend must be created, fairly to achieve what both parties are after before another cold war is initiated.
Thanks for reading,
Regards,
Andi
However it does not work. It is highly unreasonable to think that by turning a world into equally distributed wealth that it will work, there are people in this world that just would not conform, some people strive for more. Majoritably mankind would benefit, but in the long run it would just lead to a huge revolution because of personal wants becoming 'needs'.
Maybe it is just my view, but I cannot see a world working purely on Socialism or Capitalism, a blend will need to be created, a fair one, where it is possible to progress in life and become wealthy without being taxed 90%, but with poverty and crime non existent and human rights adhered to.
It i this Utopian situation that, both sides of the coin, whether Socialist or Capitalist, strive for, but arrogance causes them to rarely see the advantage of the 'opposing' side. A blend must be created, fairly to achieve what both parties are after before another cold war is initiated.
Thanks for reading,
Regards,
Andi
#22152 Socialism etc.
Posted by
on 11 May 2005 - 04:40 PM
in
General Chat
QUOTE(ermdeviation @ May 11 2005, 02:24 PM)
QUOTE(Moral Fabric @ May 11 2005, 01:13 PM)
Maybe it is just my view, but I cannot see a world working purely on Socialism or Capitalism, a blend will need to be created, a fair one, where it is possible to progress in life and become wealthy without being taxed 90%, but with poverty and crime non existent and human rights adhered to.
We live in a country with a mixed economy and it has not ended poverty or crime. To me the Welfare State has served to prove a point: that watered down, social-democractic policies will not acheive their Socialist objectives because they still rely on a capitalist economy - an economy which breeds inequality and injustice.
That's just your opinion though, and granted. mine is an opinion also
#23035 Socialism etc.
Posted by
on 14 May 2005 - 12:50 PM
in
General Chat
poor misguided ermdeviation, when will you learn? lol,... Blair it teh Pwnz0r, he is a great leader, and the SSP are a bunch of hippies and you know it, your arguement is weak and opinuated as opposed to factual, unlucky son, lol 
#23266 Socialism etc.
Posted by
on 14 May 2005 - 09:37 PM
in
General Chat
What Blair was told, was what he told us, And I'm not just some random guy that comes on to slag off people!!! check back, ermdev started on me first, when i made my arguemetn about capitlism and socialism in general,... now its became a dispute on whether or not Blair is a competant leader or not....
My point was that ermdev was saying other peoples ie my arguement was only my opinion, when blatantly so is his....
Dave and me are on a par i reckon, so far I agree with most of what he has said.
p.s. Blair Pwns
Later
My point was that ermdev was saying other peoples ie my arguement was only my opinion, when blatantly so is his....
Dave and me are on a par i reckon, so far I agree with most of what he has said.
p.s. Blair Pwns
Later
