Warning: Illegal string offset 'html' in /home/hsn/public_html/forum/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_1/skin_topic.php on line 909

integration question - HSN forum

# integration question

4 replies to this topic

Good Effort

• Members
• 66 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2007 - 03:40 PM

integrate with respect to x: (x^(1/2))/(1+x)

cheers

### #2weerydo

Showing Improvement

• Members
• 15 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2007 - 07:11 PM

ok you need to bring the (1+x) up 2 the top so the second line would be.

(x^1/2)(1+x)^-1

then use the chain rule...if you need any more help message me - better letting you try it for yourself from there

Top of the Class

• Members
• 390 posts
• Location:Cambridge
• Interests:Muzak.
• Gender:Male

Posted 14 October 2007 - 12:17 PM

QUOTE(weerydo @ Oct 12 2007, 08:11 PM)
ok you need to bring the (1+x) up 2 the top so the second line would be.

(x^1/2)(1+x)^-1

then use the chain rule...if you need any more help message me - better letting you try it for yourself from there
I can't see where this is going? I think you might be trying to differentiate this by mistake.

Paddy, try the substituion . I end up with
HMFC - Founded 1874, beefing the Cabbage since 1875

Newbie

• Members
• 2 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 17 October 2007 - 04:32 PM

An easier substitution would be x=u^2. While using tan^2 x is more intuitive, it wastes a lot of effort since you have to substitute twice to get it in to a form where you can integrate to obtain a tan^(-1) function.

Good Effort

• Members
• 66 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 14 November 2007 - 04:01 PM

cheers guys, i think for forms like that you're just meant to fire in a tan substitution (half angle mainly). like madman said its not always the easiest but apparently it always works.

#### 1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users