Warning: Illegal string offset 'html' in /home/hsn/public_html/forum/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_1/skin_topic.php on line 909

2002 Non Calc Winter Diet - HSN forum

# 2002 Non Calc Winter Diet

9 replies to this topic

### #1*Kiran*

Top of the Class

• Members
• 290 posts
• Gender:Female

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:08 PM

Hey Guys. This is probably really easy but I was wondering if anyone could help me with this as I am quite stuck.

"Given that (x - 2) and (x+3) are factors of f(x) where f(x) = 3x[^3] + 2x[^2] + cx +d, find the values of c and d."

I thought it may have something to do with (x-2)x(x+3) but I can't seem to crack it....

The answers are c = -19, d=6

### #2SncZ

Site Swot

• Members
• 114 posts
• Location:Edinburgh
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:10 PM

QUOTE(*Kiran* @ May 18 2006, 05:08 PM)

Hey Guys. This is probably really easy but I was wondering if anyone could help me with this as I am quite stuck.

"Given that (x - 2) and (x+3) are factors of f(x) where f(x) = 3x[^3] + 2x[^2] + cx +d, find the values of c and d."

I thought it may have something to do with (x-2)x(x+3) but I can't seem to crack it....

The answers are c = -19, d=6

you set up synthetic division and divide by (x-2) and (x+3) . since they're factors that you know they equal zero.

you just set up simultaneous equations and solve for c & d

### #3Nathan

Fully Fledged Genius

• Members
• 1,736 posts
• Location:Aberdeen, Scotland
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:14 PM

use synthetic divsion..or other method to factorise it

you set your remainders for x=2 and x=-3 equal to zero and solve via simultaneous equations

edit: basically what SncZ said

### #4ice_illusion

Child Prodigy

• Members
• 947 posts
• Location:Pluto
• Gender:Female

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:25 PM

You don't have to do he simultaneous equation if you do synthetic division with (x-2) and then do more synthetic division with the bigger bracket (which only has c in it) Then you just find c and sub in to get d.

### #5SncZ

Site Swot

• Members
• 114 posts
• Location:Edinburgh
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:30 PM

QUOTE(ice_illusion @ May 18 2006, 05:25 PM)

You don't have to do he simultaneous equation if you do synthetic division with (x-2) and then do more synthetic division with the bigger bracket (which only has c in it) Then you just find c and sub in to get d.

um not sure what you mean, i just done it and all my equations and brackets have c and d in them.

the general rule is: if you have 2 unknown variables, you need 2 equations to solve it.

and if u have 3 unknown variables you need 3 equations etc etc

### #6*Kiran*

Top of the Class

• Members
• 290 posts
• Gender:Female

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:39 PM

thanks guys...but I'm still kinda having problems...

once i have synthetically divided it i end up with :

8 + 2c +d for (x-2)
and
-6+(-3c) +d for (x+3)...

when I use simultaneous equations i end up with really weid answers... so I wonder if someone could please help me.. i am so dense . (I really am trying btw...)

much appreciated

### #7George

Child Prodigy

• 720 posts
• Location:West Lothian
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 04:44 PM

I think you've made a slip in the synthetic division - have you remembered to multply by 2 (or 3) each step?

### #8SncZ

Site Swot

• Members
• 114 posts
• Location:Edinburgh
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 05:00 PM

QUOTE(George @ May 18 2006, 05:44 PM)

I think you've made a slip in the synthetic division - have you remembered to multply by 2 (or 3) each step?

george im jealous of your magic powers how do you draw up a synthetic division table ?

### #9*Kiran*

Top of the Class

• Members
• 290 posts
• Gender:Female

Posted 18 May 2006 - 05:02 PM

Waw! thanks very much guys...

what I had done was for the first bit (3) I densely put 0 at the bottom...

such a thicket...

### #10George

Child Prodigy

• 720 posts
• Location:West Lothian
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 05:46 PM

QUOTE(SncZ @ May 18 2006, 06:00 PM)

george im jealous of your magic powers how do you draw up a synthetic division table ?

I used this program to make up the latex code, then pasted it in [tex] tags - you can see the code by quoting my post.

#### 1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users