Warning: Illegal string offset 'html' in /home/hsn/public_html/forum/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_1/skin_topic.php on line 909

2006 Physics Exam - HSN forum - Page 2

# 2006 Physics Exam

28 replies to this topic

### #21HatingHighers

Site Swot

• Members
• 113 posts

Posted 18 May 2006 - 02:33 PM

QUOTE(smit @ May 18 2006, 02:53 PM)

Question 6 the oil drop, how do you get the number of excess? I got how many electrons there were but didnt know what it wanted me to do.

A neutral drop has a charge of 0. So for a drop to have a charge of -1.6e-12 it must have 10,000,000 excess electrons (1.6e-12/1.6e-19).

### #22FcukWIT

Good Effort

• Members
• 90 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 02:39 PM

hmm.. was the drop neutral? I thought it needed to have a charge of at least one electron?

### #23Jason Bourne

Good Effort

• Members
• 95 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 02:44 PM

hello
Nothing!!!!!!!!

### #24waitingforan_alibi

Showing Improvement

• Members
• 37 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 May 2006 - 06:08 PM

hi
For the question on the cyclotron - if you worked out the radius when it enters the right hand dee (7 a ii) i doubled that radius for when it enters the left hand dee because when you look at the diagram (if you have the paper) the diameter of the old path is now the radius of the new path. I cant remember what that gave me but i ll work it out when i have stopped revision for maths for tomorrow

### #25herbeey

Site Swot

• Members
• 161 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 19 May 2006 - 06:27 PM

That Dee question was uncalled for.

The good news is that almost NOONE got it.

An easy-ish exam.
Signatures suck. They clog up websites and serve no purpose.

### #26Jason Bourne

Good Effort

• Members
• 95 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 20 May 2006 - 09:59 AM

Is anyone %100 sure they know how to do the dee question. If so please say how as im sure alot of people would like to know (or maybe not).

Im guessing you had to use to get part ai.

Using for part aii.

For part aiii. it was only 2 marks ..............so couldnt have been anything too complicated. Its accelerated by the same potential so i just doubled the velocity, i duno if this is right.

par b:

part c:

Dont know if any of this is right.
Nothing!!!!!!!!

### #27johnk

Newbie

• Members
• 2 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 21 May 2006 - 05:46 PM

The new kinetic energy is just equal to the existing kinetic energy plus the work done by the potential to accelerate it.

### #28Vixus

Top of the Class

• Members
• 260 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 23 May 2006 - 09:17 PM

QUOTE(FcukWIT @ May 17 2006, 05:17 PM)
Btw. How many excess electrons were there?

107 or something. You divide the overall charge by e.

Yeah I just doubled the velocity for that question, didn't really know what else to do.

### #29Changer

Showing Improvement

• Members
• 12 posts
• Gender:Male
• Gender:Male

Posted 31 May 2006 - 06:09 PM

It wasn't exactly twice the initial velocity when it went into the left dee because although it was getting the same amount of energy the E(k) isn't directly proportional to the velocity, it's proportional to the velocity^2. I worked it out by saying

Final E(k) = Initial E(k) + QV

But I guess you could have just multiplied that first speed by root 2

#### 1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users