Warning: Illegal string offset 'html' in /home/hsn/public_html/forum/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_1/skin_topic.php on line 909

Help with wavelength of laser question - HSN forum

# Help with wavelength of laser question

6 replies to this topic

### #1jambo david

Showing Improvement

• Members
• 42 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 04:03 PM

Photons with a frequency of x 10 14 Hz are incident on excited atoms, causing the atoms to emit their excess energy.

Calculate the wavelength of the laser light produced. Give your answer to the nearest nanometre.

### #2The Wedge Effect

HSN Legend

• Members
• 2,477 posts
• Location:Paisley
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 04:15 PM

Do they not give you a proper value, like 5x1014 Hz?

This is a simple case of using the formula ...I'm not sure if the formula's right, it's been a long time since I used it.

### #3dfx

Fully Fledged Genius

• Members
• 1,955 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 04:50 PM

The formula is f = v/lambda.

### #4jambo david

Showing Improvement

• Members
• 42 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 05:08 PM

QUOTE(dfx @ Apr 24 2006, 05:50 PM)

The formula is f = v/lambda.

Sorry

Photons with a frequency of 6.45*10^14 Hz are incident on excited atoms, causing the atoms to emit their excess energy.

Calculate the wavelength of the laser light produced. Give your answer to the nearest nanometre

The answer i got was 4.65*10^-7 however, the answer should be .465*10^3

### #5dfx

Fully Fledged Genius

• Members
• 1,955 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 05:18 PM

Hmmm... have they given any information about the work function?

### #6jambo david

Showing Improvement

• Members
• 42 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 05:34 PM

QUOTE(dfx @ Apr 24 2006, 06:18 PM)

Hmmm... have they given any information about the work function?

nope just exactly as i wrote above. It's scholar though and i know they have a few mistakes

### #7dfx

Fully Fledged Genius

• Members
• 1,955 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 24 April 2006 - 09:25 PM

Ah, probably is a mistake. Just the decimal places that they seemed to have got wrong.

#### 1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users