

Discuss your answers...
#41
Posted 03 June 2004 - 02:41 PM
#42
Posted 03 June 2004 - 04:05 PM
QUOTE (porsch1909 @ Jun 3 2004, 03:41 PM) |
i put the sulpuric acid going to the electrolysis |
I did that too!
#44
Posted 03 June 2004 - 07:26 PM
QUOTE (werlop @ Jun 2 2004, 12:37 PM) |
Has anyone else noticed that all the problem solving for most highers is straight out the associated advanced higher KU. A here we come:) |
Well, I have noticed some weird problem-solving questions. In the 2003 exam they put a weird problem-solving question for the second last question; this seems to be a new addition to the exam as they did not have that in the 2000-2002 exams as far as I can see. Maybe they are putting this in due to the fact that there are no more Grid questions?
| PPA Hints | Chemistry Formulae | H Maths Links |
#45
Posted 03 June 2004 - 07:29 PM
| PPA Hints | Chemistry Formulae | H Maths Links |
#46
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:19 PM

#47
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:22 PM
and the volume of hydrogen obatined when the moles of hydrogen are known from the charge equations (current * time)
This should have been easy marks as I remember doing this as a PS in 2003 exam.
#48
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:23 PM
QUOTE (ally @ Jun 3 2004, 07:26 PM) | ||
Well, I have noticed some weird problem-solving questions. In the 2003 exam they put a weird problem-solving question for the second last question; this seems to be a new addition to the exam as they did not have that in the 2000-2002 exams as far as I can see. Maybe they are putting this in due to the fact that there are no more Grid questions? |
not all comes from AH
and not all AH comes from first year uni
#49
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:25 PM
QUOTE (ally @ Jun 2 2004, 12:38 PM) |
Oh yeh I meant to say propyne, I got that aswell. Just that I wrote prop-1-yne instead. |
yeah u still get the mark for this
#50
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:26 PM
QUOTE (ally @ Jun 2 2004, 12:43 PM) |
What did you get for how you measure the molar volume of Hydrogen? Oh and btw, does anyone know how CO2 can dissolve in water. |
yes
under the correct conditions i.e. closed system CO2 can dissolve in water to form carbonic acid
#51
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:28 PM
QUOTE (Laura @ Jun 2 2004, 01:08 PM) | ||
Yes, I got that too btw ally, I think that the CO2 dissolving thing might have something to do with polar covalent bonds in the CO2 molecule (not sure if this is right coz I havn't checked the data book - I think I might burn it lol! ![]() |
laura
carbonyl is polar but CO2 is overall non-polar since its a linear moleucle and is sysmmetrical so partial polarisation of molecule cancels, so technically this is not the correct answer. but it does use the hydrogen bonding in water to bond to the oxygen etc but the mechanism of this is beyond the scope of Higher.
#52
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:30 PM
QUOTE (ally @ Jun 2 2004, 02:23 PM) | ||
The last question was set in a problem solving context so you did not need any real understanding. Yeah it was quite weird when I looked at it, but I think I understood what it was asking for. |
the last q's are usually A level so don't worry.
in general as the paper progressed it gets more difficult thats for both sections a and b.
#53
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:32 PM
QUOTE (Laura @ Jun 2 2004, 02:41 PM) | ||
I drew sulphuric acid going into the neutraliser bit, not because I knew that was where it was supposed to go, but because I couldn't really see anywhere else it could go ![]() I thought that question was quite hard (Q3 I think it was) I didn't really get what gas A and process B were - I just guessed. I think I put extraction for process B but I don't even think that is a type of reaction! btw, 55.55 sounds vaguely familiar, except I think I rounded it to 55.56 - do you think that'll be ok? ![]() |
it depends on the no of sig. figures in the data in the question
however watch rounding if u put even +/- 0.01 too high u will lost at least 1/2 mark.
#54
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:34 PM
QUOTE (maloney_luver @ Jun 2 2004, 05:35 PM) |
i thought the exam was relatively straightforward....me and my teacher both got 58.55kg for the mass of zinc deposited but we disagreed on the value for the enthalpy of neutralistion question. For the question with the magnesium ribbon i drew the graduated tube inverted and filled with the water with the funnel upside down and sticking inside the tube, the magnesium ribbon sitting under the funnel and it was all in the beaker of water. overall not bad at all ![]() |
if thats for gas measurement either inverted tube or gas syringe is acceptable
#55
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:37 PM
What u think an A will be if its between 80 and 75% I might just manage it!
thought to be more 78 way as it was on the whole slightly easier than 2002, not confirmed of course
markers meeting for H Chemistry next week so some ppl's scripts will already be marked by Monday

#56
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:48 PM
QUOTE (blueheaduk @ Jun 2 2004, 11:30 PM) |
The gas was used to make sulphuric acid.... so it had to be sulphur dioxide. I think i wrote trioxide though ![]() |
sulphur trioxide is the gas used to make sulphuric acid
the sulphur dioxide is converted to SO3 but its the SO3 which reacts
#57
Posted 03 June 2004 - 09:51 PM
QUOTE (james1 @ Jun 3 2004, 09:48 PM) | ||
sulphur trioxide is the gas used to make sulphuric acid the sulphur dioxide is converted to SO3 but its the SO3 which reacts |
i just brought a huge batch of news to most ppl again

SO2 is NOT directly used
it shud have been easy if ur teacher explained the contact process
#58
Posted 03 June 2004 - 11:24 PM
Our class certianly did not get taught about the Contact Process; is it in the syllabus?
If it was Sulpur Trioxide I doubt many people got the answer; with the exception on blueheaduk of course.
| PPA Hints | Chemistry Formulae | H Maths Links |
#59
Posted 04 June 2004 - 08:37 AM
But i think they could ask for PS
SO3 is definitely the gas used to manufacture sulhphuric acid.
hope this helps
#60
Posted 04 June 2004 - 04:38 PM
QUOTE |
james1 Posted on Jun 3 2004, 09:34 PM QUOTE (maloney_luver @ Jun 2 2004, 05:35 PM) i thought the exam was relatively straightforward....me and my teacher both got 58.55kg for the mass of zinc deposited but we disagreed on the value for the enthalpy of neutralistion question. For the question with the magnesium ribbon i drew the graduated tube inverted and filled with the water with the funnel upside down and sticking inside the tube, the magnesium ribbon sitting under the funnel and it was all in the beaker of water. overall not bad at all if thats for gas measurement either inverted tube or gas syringe is acceptable |
well seen as how it gave u the apparatus to use, it had to be the graduated tube as the gas syringe wasnt there! nice try for trying to look smart but i knew i was right anyway
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users