physicsforums. The parallel to languages is great in some senses... but even languages are simply an aesthetic "invention" which are a result of man's faculty of communication developing over the ages. Math on the other hand describes existing relationships in nature. You can't suddenly introduce your own equation - well you could but only if it fits in. Ok I'm losing it.


Mathematics
#21
Posted 17 January 2006 - 04:17 PM
physicsforums. The parallel to languages is great in some senses... but even languages are simply an aesthetic "invention" which are a result of man's faculty of communication developing over the ages. Math on the other hand describes existing relationships in nature. You can't suddenly introduce your own equation - well you could but only if it fits in. Ok I'm losing it.
#22
Posted 17 January 2006 - 04:22 PM
#23
Posted 17 January 2006 - 04:24 PM
#25
Posted 17 January 2006 - 04:52 PM
as for whether it was invented or discovered.....i don't really know!
tomorrow doesn't matter,
turn that music up,
till the windows start to shatter,
cos you're the only one who can get me on my feet,
& i can't even dance
No Tomorrow - Orson
#26
Posted 17 January 2006 - 05:27 PM
#27
Posted 17 January 2006 - 10:56 PM
if this world was one without language, would there be Maths? Although Maths can be interpreted without words, everything in Maths has a name. But without a language, it wouldnt have a name, so there would be no Maths. Which backs my view up of Maths being invented the same way that a language would be invented.
Hmmmm, I dunno if you peeps get wot am tryin to say, but it makes sense in my head!
T in the Park 2008!
YAS!
#28
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:07 PM
if this world was one without language, would there be Maths? Although Maths can be interpreted without words, everything in Maths has a name. But without a language, it wouldnt have a name, so there would be no Maths. Which backs my view up of Maths being invented the same way that a language would be invented.
Hmmmm, I dunno if you peeps get wot am tryin to say, but it makes sense in my head!
I don't think there would be maths if there was no language because maths is usually spoken or written, both of which are forms of language (i think :S)
#29
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:11 PM
#30
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:13 PM
T in the Park 2008!
YAS!
#31
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:17 PM
Edit: Paul, "shit" goes quite well in the sloganiser. It just said "The Gods made shit" and "There's lots of fun in shit" - heh.
#32
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:32 PM
yeh, good point bout the laws that predate human kind part. Is there laws in Maths that predate human kind though?
T in the Park 2008!
YAS!
#33
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:41 PM
#34
Posted 17 January 2006 - 11:41 PM
i.e. we call the stuff we breathe 'air'. Air always exists, but it was only given a name when we realised that we actually breathed stuff in. The same goes with maths. It always exists but sections in maths are only named when we realise the exist.
#36
Posted 18 January 2006 - 12:17 AM
#37
Posted 18 January 2006 - 12:30 PM
But after some research I can!
Maths wasn't to be until the first Mathematicians invented it. What Shaun says, "it always exists" - in a way it has. But had it not been invented, then it wouldnt have previously existed. Here's a quote that sums it all up
"Mathematics is a tool, a model.
It is something that we can use to describe or model parts of reality, or
any other system based on quantifiable things. Mathematics can be used to model finance, logic, even color. Mathematics itself did not exist before the first mathematicians. What was discovered was how to mold the model to fit reality. What was invented was the model itself. Mathematics was invented. How to use mathematics was discovered."
T in the Park 2008!
YAS!
#38
Posted 18 January 2006 - 02:16 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users