62 replies to this topic

[Jas0n]

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/j...ddemolition.htm

I found this video quite convincing and to be honest a bit scary.

[YIC]

I even heard a theory from the place I got the other video that both towers were purposely brought down after the crashes. Perhaps a charger was put in?

There has even been allegations about flight 93 ( http://www.flight93crash.com/ )

[YIC]

btw, good link Jas0n

[AppleCore]

I even heard a theory from the place I got the other video that both towers were purposely brought down after the crashes. Perhaps a charger was put in?

There has even been allegations about flight 93 ( http://www.flight93crash.com/)

Link dosnt seem to work

[Ally]

I even heard a theory from the place I got the other video that both towers were purposely brought down after the crashes. Perhaps a charger was put in?

There has even been allegations about flight 93 ( http://www.flight93crash.com/)

Link dosnt seem to work

It's: http://www.flight93crash.com/

[AppleCore]

ha!! ok. works now!

[YIC]

sorry, but I have now fixed it

[Jas0n]

btw, good link Jas0n

lol I found it on ebaumsworld, thought I would share with you guys.

[wikked-dfc]

Does anyone else think the first part seems to be in time with the music?

I was actually quite scared by that bit near the end where they showed the towers collapsing and the explosions further below. Dunno if I believe it was planned or whether it was a possible safety device so that should the towers ever come under attack they explode so that they don't topple forward/back onto other buildings. Scary Stuff just to see it again tho.

[Discogirl17]

I dont want to see it again.
Its too emotional.

[The Wedge Effect]

Yeah...so sad. But, I've seen the plane crash on TV so many time it's almost become part of life...ALMOST! Still sad to think all those innocent people died for nothing.

[Discogirl17]

I cant accept it and it still affects me more than the London minature version ever will.

[The Wedge Effect]

I agree. The London incident brought back memories of 9/11 though. Something I didn't want to happen. But these people who died in both at the hand of terrorists ought to be remembered...somehow. Maybe a monument in the UK in their memories should be erected, if there isn't already one...

[Discogirl17]

No. No monument. Thats not fitting. It could be graffitied. The towers were a monument in themselves. Maybe a park named in memory of them.

[The Wedge Effect]

No. No monument. Thats not fitting. It could be graffitied. The towers were a monument in themselves. Maybe a park named in memory of them.

Hmm. Never thought of that. But, on the topic of graffiti, could the park not be vandalised too? =/

[Discogirl17]

Yep but thats just nature

[The Wedge Effect]

True. Well, I guess a monument could still be erected if they built a pond in a memorial park and erected the monument in the middle of it on an island, to make an impact. But, it's not up to me to make a monument or park in their memory, that's the government or council's job.

[ermd]

Perhaps a monument for those who died at the hands of Western terrorists too, then?

[YIC]

I like your thinking Ermdeviation :up:

[Scott]

I never trust anything on these sites, so about a minute and a half into this video, I decided to stop it. I trust what I saw, and I saw two, fuel laden 767s smash into the Twin Towers (They originated from Boston, ergo they both would have had would have had well over 300,000lbs of fuel, as 767s can take a maximum of 387,000lbs of fuel, yes, it wasn't maximum distance the 767 can fly between Boston and Los Angeles, but if you take into account the several hours of extra fuel they put on then you are looking at maximum fuel). Now, try a little experiment in your home. Place some talcom powder on one side of a table, then drop a heavy book on the other side. The talcom powder will still go everywhere (You do this at your caution, I'm not responsible for people breaking objects like tables or injuring themselves in this process ). This accounts for the dust, now the glass on the lobby floors. Glass is not the superstrong structure this guy thinks it is. Now, the glass is attached to a building that has just experienced a huge force of energy (I've not done Physics in ages, so I wouldn't even be able to guess who much energy) but it was hit by a plane at a speed that the plane should only be at, at cruise altitude, and it still had lots of fuel. Even though the windows at the bottom were several hundred feet below (Around about 800ft below) there was no way the glass would hold in place.

Now, take into account the masses of dust in the Twin Towers, and think of what the dust will do when it is hit at around 500mph, and explodes because there is so much force and the 300,000lbs of fuel has exploded. Now, this fuel burns at an extremely high temperature, and the metal trusses used on the twin towers simply could not take the heat, and so they basically melted and bent on the floors nearest where the plane hit. This made the top of the towers completely unstable as the floors below them had very little structure left, ergo the top floors caved in, and they fall down, floor by floor.

This guy must seriously think that a plane, still with lots of fuel on board and travelling in excess of 500mph cannot do much damage. As an aviation enthusiast I know all too well what sort of damage it can do, and so do many other people, who actually thought about this and gave a loigical explanation of why the Towers collapsed, so many architects and engineers. Something tells me that I'd rather trust their perfectly logical explanation than the crazy idea of "some guy" who posted on the internet, because it's always a source of reliable and truthful information